4 familles de personnes par rapport à leur intelligence du terrain

(de Eric Oullereau)

Voici avec ce tableau (en-dessous de l'anglais) une vue globale de 4 familles de personnes par rapport au terrain du sujet, de l'idée, ou de la matière, du domaine. Il est important si on veut augmenter son autonomie de savoir où se situer dans ces catégories afin de voir où progresser, et éviter de se faire avoir dans la dépendance

c'est surtout pour le vocabulaire, quelqu'un dans la réalité, ne se retrouvant pas forcément dans tous les éléments d'une même colonne :

4 families of people with regard to their intelligence of the ground

(from Eric Oullereau)

Here, with this board, is a global sight of 4 families of people with regard to the ground of the subject, the idea, or the material, the domaine It is important if we want to increase its autonomy of knowledge where be situated in these categories to see where to progress, and to avoid being made credit note in the dependance

it is especially for the vocabulary, somebody in the reality, not finding itself necessarily in all the elements of the same column:

GOOD CONNOISSEUR of GROUND	WIDE CONNOISSEUR of GROUND with PARTIAL INTELLIGENT EXPERIENCE	SO CALLED CONNOISSEUR of GROUND without (or almost) INTELLIGENT EXPERIENCE	IGNORAMUS of GROUND, (of the subject, the material)
the good connoisseur and good follower of ground bases himself very weakly on nearby colleagues to complete its very big working knowledge	the rather good connoisseur, the researcher, takes information of the good practitioners of ground, or more or less	the popularizer (called wrongly expert) bases himself on experts researchers, their papers, truncated by the lobbies	the ignoramus of ground bases himself on 'experts' not researchers, paid by the lobbies to promote their trade
It has an elaborate structure of observation of the ground and the accumulation of outside information, and analysis, reflection, synthesis	It has a structure averagely elaborate of observation of the ground and the accumulation of outside information, analysis, reflection, synthesis	It has a light structure of observation of the ground, it knows how to put a name in a problem its false superiority) but has the narrow minded spirit of " expert ' (of specialist)	It has no (serious) structure of reflection to analyze the information, slowed down also by its big ignorance of the wide reality
It believes that we can any knowledge on its body, as individual, with a small further information thanks to an adult of the other sex	It believes that we can know many things about his body, but that it is infinite, not knowing how to too much restrict itself to the main part	It believes that we cannot know about its body that in its speciality, according to the former C.E.O.. of the C.N.R.S. = > dependence to the other experts normal	It believes that we cannot know everything about the body and with specialists' need because it is very complex = > dependence to the other experts normal
It made out a will on the ground with excellent, ergonomic positive result, and bases itself mainly above	It made tests on the ground with positive, rather ergonomic results, and can base itself above, but masters badly for the positive	It noticed problems or states on the ground, by not having for a good part, almost nothing included or quite back to front	It heard(understood) by hearsay most of the time of ignoramuses as it, average citizens, journalists, politicians (both of them saying themselves citizens and that they base themselves on experts)
It is very connected to his body, independent from any drug (alcohol, tobacco, music, ...) and knows how to estimate exactly his progress	It is connected enough to his body, independent from any drug (alcohol, tobacco, music, ... ) And knows well enough how to estimate his progress	It is a little disconnected from his body accepting what is a little bit hostile to the senses and to its body (a little wine, cigar or music,...)	It is disconnected enough from his(its) body, and often depends on drugs (alcohol, tobacco, music, or more several times: illegal drugs, medicine)
It has a very wide vision of the ideas, the Quaternary, no paranoiac, because without enemy nor believing to have it with regard to its ideas, being careful	It has a rather wide vision of the ideas, trinaire mainly	It has a rather Manichean vision of the ideas with several times some doubts for a trinaire vision, he is rather a little bit paranoiac	It has a very Manichean vision of the ideas, the good idea ' / the enemies of ' the good idea ', several times in a little bit paranoiac, mindless trend
it is profoundly determined to have integrated, practically, the working knowledge in his/her lifetime, deep, omniscient to feel younger	It is motivated enough to integrate practically what he knows, but it is limited enough or specialized	It is satisfied with its knowledge of false specialist and superficial, inquiring slightly moreover, mattering on a religious or scientific rescuer (one other than it, for it)	It is not determined to have the basic knowledge in its lifetime: "to think of the future generations" = > agrees to commit suicide (slowly)

GOOD CONNOISSEUR of GROUND

WIDE CONNOISSEUR of GROUND with PARTIAL INTELLIGENT EXPERIENCE

SO CALLED CONNOISSEUR of GROUND without (or almost) INTELLIGENT EXPERIENCE

IGNORAMUS of GROUND, (of the subject, the material)

the good connoisseur and good follower of ground bases himself very weakly on nearby colleagues to

complete its very big working knowledge

the rather good connoisseur, the researcher, takes information of the good practitioners of ground, or more or less

the popularizer (called wrongly expert) bases himself on experts researchers, their papers, truncated by the lobbies

the ignoramus of ground bases himself on 'experts' not researchers, paid by the lobbies to promote their trade

It has an elaborate structure of observation of the ground and the accumulation of outside information, and analysis, reflection, synthesis

It has a structure averagely elaborate of observation of the ground and the accumulation of outside information, analysis, reflection, synthesis

It has a light structure of observation of the ground, it knows how to put a name in a problem its false superiority) but has the narrow minded spirit of " expert ' (of specialist)

It has no (serious) structure of reflection to analyze the information, slowed down also by its big ignorance of the wide reality

It believes that we can any knowledge on its body, as individual, with a small further information thanks to an adult of the other sex

It believes that we can know many things about his body, but that it is infinite, not knowing how to too much restrict itself to the main part

It believes that we cannot know about its body that in its speciality, according to the former C.E.O.. of the C.N.R.S. = > dependence to the other experts normal

It believes that we cannot know everything about the body and with specialists' need because it is very complex = > dependence to the other experts normal

It made out a will on the ground with excellent, ergonomic positive result, and bases itself mainly above

It made tests on the ground with positive, rather ergonomic results, and can base itself above, but masters badly for the positive

It noticed problems or states on the ground, by not having for a good part, almost nothing included or quite back to front

It heard(understood) by hearsay most of the time of ignoramuses as it, average citizens, journalists, politicians (both of them saying themselves citizens and that they base themselves on experts)

It is very connected to his body, independent from any drug (alcohol, tobacco, music, ...) and knows how to estimate exactly his progress

It is connected enough to his body, independent from any drug (alcohol, tobacco, music, ... ) And knows well enough how to estimate his progress

It is a little disconnected from his body accepting what is a little bit hostile to the senses and to its body (a little wine, cigar or music,...)

It is disconnected enough from his(its) body, and often depends on drugs (alcohol, tobacco, music, or more several times: illegal drugs, medicine)

It has a very wide vision of the ideas, the Quaternary, no paranoiac, because without enemy nor believing to have it with regard to its ideas, being careful

It has a rather wide vision of the ideas, trinaire mainly

It has a rather Manichean vision of the ideas with several times some doubts for a trinaire vision, he is rather a little bit paranoiac

It has a very Manichean vision of the ideas, the good idea ' / the enemies of ' the good idea ', several times in a little bit paranoiac, mindless trend

it is profoundly determined to have integrated, practically, the working knowledge in his/her lifetime, deep, omniscient to feel younger

It is motivated enough to integrate practically what he knows, but it is limited enough or specialized

It is satisfied with its knowledge of false specialist and superficial, inquiring slightly moreover, mattering on a religious or scientific rescuer (one other than it, for it)

It is not determined to have the basic knowledge in its lifetime: "to think of the future generations" = > agrees to commit suicide (slowly)

Application for agronomists in this page agronomists : like robots without senses

4 familles de personnes par rapport à leur intelligence du terrain

Voici une vue globale de 4 familles de personnes par rapport au terrain du sujet, de l'idée, ou de la matière, du domaine.

Il est important si on veut augmenter son autonomie de savoir où se situer dans ces catégories afin de voir où progresser, et éviter de se faire avoir dans la dépendance, c'est surtout pour le vocabulaire, quelqu'un dans la réalité, ne se retrouvant pas forcément dans tous les éléments d'une même colonne :

( qui sera peut-être affinée après )

BON CONNAISSEUR de TERRAIN	CONNAISSEUR LARGE de TERRAIN avec EXPERIENCE INTELLIGENTE PARTIELLE	PSEUDO CONNAISSEUR de TERRAIN sans (ou presque) EXPERIENCE INTELLIGENTE	IGNORANT de TERRAIN, (du sujet, de la matière)
le bon connaisseur et bon pratiquant de terrain se base très faiblement sur des collègues voisins pour compléter sa très grande connaissance pratique	l'assez bon connaisseur, chercheur, prend des informations des bons praticiens de terrain, ou à peu près	le vulgarisateur (appelé faussement expert) se base sur des experts chercheurs, leurs écrits, tronqués par les lobbys	l'ignorant de terrain se base sur des 'experts' non chercheurs, payés par les lobbys pour promouvoir leur commerce
il a une structure élaborée d'observation du terrain et d'accumulation d'informations extérieures, et d'analyse, de réflexion, de synthèse	il a une structure moyennement élaborée d'observation du terrain et d'accumulation d'informations extérieures, d'analyse, de réflexion, de synthèse	il a une grille légère d'observation du terrain, il sait mettre un nom à un problème (sa fausse supériorité) mais a l'esprit bloqué d''expert' (de spécialiste )	il n'a pas de grille (sérieuse) de réflexion pour analyser l'information, freiné aussi par sa grande ignorance de la large réalité
il croit qu'on peut tout savoir sur son corps, en tant qu'individu, avec un petit complément d'information grâce à un adulte de l'autre sexe	il croit qu'on peut savoir beaucoup de choses sur son corps, mais que c'est infini, ne sachant pas trop se borner à l'essentiel	il croit qu'on ne peut savoir sur son corps que dans sa spécialité, selon l'ancienne P.D.G. du C.N.R.S. => dépendance aux autres experts normale	il croit qu'on ne peut pas tout savoir sur son corps et avec besoin de spécialistes car c'est très complexe => dépendance aux autres experts normale
il a testé sur le terrain avec résultat positif excellent, ergonomique, et se base majoritairement dessus	il a fait des tests sur le terrain avec des résultats positifs, assez ergonomiques, et peut se baser dessus, mais maîtrise mal pour le positif	il a constaté des problèmes ou des états sur le terrain, en n'ayant pour une bonne partie, quasiment rien compris ou tout à l'envers	il a entendu par ouï-dire le plus souvent d'ignorants comme lui, citoyens lambda, journalistes, politiciens ( les 2 se disant citoyens et qu'ils se basent sur des experts )
il est très connecté à son corps, indépendant de toute drogue ( alcool, tabac, musique,...) et sait évaluer précisément ses progrès	il est assez connecté à son corps, indépendant de toute drogue ( alcool, tabac, musique,... ), et sait assez bien évaluer ses progrès	il est un peu déconnecté de son corps acceptant ce qui est un peu hostile aux sens et à son corps ( un peu de vin, cigare ou musique,...)	il est assez déconnecté de son corps, et souvent dépend de drogues (alcool, tabac, musique, ou plus quelques fois : drogues illégales, médicaments)
il a une vision très large des idées, quaternaire, non paranoïaque, car sans ennemi ni croyant en avoir par rapport à ses idées, étant prudent	il a une vision assez large des idées, trinaire principalement	il a une vision assez manichéenne des idées avec quelques fois quelques doutes pour une vision trinaire, il est plutôt un peu paranoïaque	il a une vision très manichéenne des idées, 'la bonne idée' / les ennemis de 'la bonne idée', quelques fois à tendance un peu paranoïaque, irréfléchie
il est profondément déterminé à avoir intégré, pratiquement, la connaissance pratique de son vivant, profonde, omnisciente pour rajeunir	il est assez motivé pour intégrer pratiquement ce qu'il sait, mais c'est assez limité ou spécialisé	il se satisfait de sa connaissance de faux spécialiste et superficielle, s'informant légèrement en plus, comptant sur un sauveur religieux ou scientifique (un autre que lui, pour lui)	il n'est pas déterminé à avoir la connaissance de base de son vivant : "penser aux générations futures" => accepte de se suicider (lentement)

Je donnerai quelques exemples d'application : parlant de l'agronome, du médecin et de l'enseignant en classe, avec des comparaisons avec d'autres personnes de "terrain" de façon succincte ici, et plus large dans les parties correspondantes , les agronomes étant dans la partie 'culture' et les médecins dans la partie 'santé' principalement

Pour une application avec les agronomes, voir la page agronomes : comme des robots sans sens / agronomists : like robots without senses 'dans la partie sur la culture du sol.